The Internet, of course, changed all that by enabling people to enter into agreements online, without the use of signatures to show notice and assent. So, are the online agreements really binding and enforceable?
Types of Online Agreements
First, let's take a look at some types of agreements that do not require a signature.
You have probably heard about a shrinkwrap agreement. It is a printed form that typically appears on the outside of a box containing software. Opening the box typically means that you have agreed to the terms of the agreement. You don't really have ways to negotiate it, but you should be able to return the software if you disagree with the terms and have not yet opened the box. Sometimes, the software provider cannot fit all of the terms on the outside of the package. Then, opening the package does not mean that you consent to the terms, but installing the software does.
An online version of a shrinkwrap agreement is a clickwrap agreement. It is an online contract that typically requires the user to click the "I Agree" button to show consent with the terms of the agreement. The user cannot download the app or install the software until he or she clicks the "I Agree" button. Some agreements require the user to scroll down to the end of the agreement before they can click the "I Agree" button. These are sometimes referred to as scrollwrap agreements and are a subset of clickwrap agreements.
Some internet contracts do not require the user to click the "I Agree" button to show acceptance. The users are notified of the existence of these contracts and the applicability of the website's terms of use when they proceed through the website's sign-in or login process. These contracts are referred to as sign-in-wrap contracts.
Online agreements that do not have the "I Agree" button are called browsewrap agreements. A good example of a browsewrap agreement is a website terms of use or privacy policy. It typically begins with something like this:
This Terms of Use (together with our Privacy Policy, incorporated herein by reference, the “Agreement”) is a legal agreement between you and [ ] (“[ ]” or “we”). By accessing our website [ ].com (the “Site”), you agree to comply with and be legally bound by the Agreement. If you do not agree, please do not access our Site.Users do not have to take any affirmative steps to show their acceptance of a browsewrap agreement. They give assent by simply continuing to use the site. However, it is much more difficult to prove notice and assent in a browsewrap agreements because users of a website might not notice the terms of use policy that is hidden in the bottom of the screen. For this reason, courts have not always deemed them to be enforceable.
A hybrid version of a clickwrap and a browsewrap agreement may be used by some websites if they have two types of users: those who use the information on the website without creating an account, and those who create an account to access enhanced features. So, a clickwrap terms of use would be used for those creating an account (by asking to click "I Agree" button before the users can create it) and also placing the browsewarp version of same terms of use on the website for those users who chose not to create accounts.
Enforceability of Online Agreements
Now, let's discuss some of the legal issues involved with the enforceability of browsewrap and clickwrap agreements. As I mentioned before, the two things that courts look at are (i) whether the user had sufficient notice of the terms and (ii) whether the user really consented to these terms.
Clickwrap agreements. The main problem here revolves around the consent requirement. Recently, courts have been paying particular attention to the potential of altering terms in the clickwrap contracts. So, be ready that the court may ask to prove that the user clicked "I Agree" button to a particular version of the agreement or terms of use. To avoid any problems, companies need to keep records of all versions of their online policies or agreements and be able to prove when each user actually consented to the terms. The best way would be to have the users consent again after each modification of the agreement. Recent cases about clickwrap contracts include Dillon v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A., 2016 WL 117513 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2016); Handy v. LogMeIn, Inc., 2015 WL 4508669 (E.D. Cal. July 24, 2015); Resorb Networks, Inc. v. YouNow.com, 30 N.Y.S.3d 506 (Sup. Ct. 2016) and Berkson v. Gogo LLC, 97 F. Supp. 3d 359 (E.D.N.Y. 2015).
Browsewrap agreements. Enforceability of browsewrap agreements is much more difficult to establish because they don't require any particular action on the part of the user to manifest assent. So, here the courts have been battling with both issues of whether the users were put on sufficient notice of the terms and whether they actually agreed to them. Because of the passive nature of "assent", courts focus on the circumstances of customers' use and the question of whether the user had actual or constructive knowledge of the website's policies. The Court in Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc., 763 F.3d 1171 (9th Cir. 2014) said "Whether a user has inquiry notice of a browsewrap agreement, in turn, depends on the design and content of the website and the agreement’s webpage." In the past, browsewrap contracts have not been enforced where the link to them was buried at the bottom of the page, or put somewhere in a corner where it was hard to find, or was visible only if you had to scroll down to the next screen, or could access it only after a multi-step process of clicking though non-obvious links. On the other hand, courts liked websites that had "explicit textual notice that continued use will act as a manifestation of the user's intent to be bound" by the online agreements".
Sign-in-wrap agreements. These contracts will generally be held enforceable so long as the users have clear unambiguous notice of the terms and an effective opportunity to access those terms at the time they are signing in / logging into the site.
Practical Steps
To summarize, below is my list of recommendations regarding online contracts:
1. It is best to use clickwrap / scrollwrap / sign-in-wrap agreements rather than browsewrap ones. This means adding an "I agree" or "I accept" button.
2. Have users agree to any change to your online policies when they next log in / sign into your website. For browsewrap version, clearly state in bold on the first page the date when the agreement was last modified.
3. A hyperlink to the terms of use and other policies should be in large font, all caps or in bold (i.e., not hidden, clearly visible).
4. A hyperlink to the policies should appear on every page of the website. As the court in Berkson v. Gogo said, it should not be "buried at the bottom of a webpage or tucked away in obscure corners of the website."
5. The online policies should be easy to download and print.
6. It is a good idea to have the users scroll through the agreement before accepting it.
7. A website with a browsewrap terms of use should have a conspicuous notice appearing on every screen that by using this site, user agrees to the site's term of use.
8. For clickwrap contracts, - keep records of all versions of the online agreements and policies, and know when each user consented and to which version. It is best to ask users to consent to each modification of the policies.
This article is not a legal advice, and was written for general informational purposes only. If you have questions or comments about the article or are interested in learning more about this topic, feel free to contact its author, Arina Shulga. Ms. Shulga is the founder of Shulga Law Firm, P.C., a New York-based boutique law firm specializing in advising individual and corporate clients on aspects of corporate, securities, and intellectual property law.